Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Kline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Terry Kline

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Vice president of a non-notable hotel company? With not a single reference providing substantial coverage about him from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. Ref 1 is about the company. Ref 2 has a photo of him but seems to be mainly about hte president of the company; 3 & 4 each mention  his name once. Ref 5, dealing with the company progress in the field of acquisitions in which the article claims him to be a leader, does not even mention his name. Written by a contributor who has edited nothing else--except the now deleted page on the president of the company. .

I consider this A7 territory, but another admin disagreed.  DGG ( talk ) 06:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a man with a job at a firm on which there is a declined AfC draft (by the same contributor, whose editing concerns the firm and its executives, though with no declared connection). The references provided are routine in-role mentions and my searches are not finding better: no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable, PR -- Devoke water   (talk)  10:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Priyanjali singh (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and AllyD. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I declined the A7, because I think there is a reasonable chance, say 1 in 5, that a person with this kind of position will have significant coverage and be notable. However, on further searches plus the comments of those above who have done their searches, this seems to be one of the other four. Delete. (Unless someone finds sources better than any presented so far.) DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - insufficient coverage for inclusion. --IWI (talk) 22:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.