Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Pruyne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 04:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Terry Pruyne


Was originally speedy-tagged, but since he's an author, I want to let the community decide. P.B. Pilh e  t  /  Talk  03:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

http://www.mansfield.edu/news/updater/archive/02-03/up11-22.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.24.207.141 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - A quick Google search reveals no evidence that the book is notable, nor the author himself , so no evidence that this article meets any notability standards. Fails WP:V, at least. --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Your Google search spells the book title wrong. The actual title gets 27 hits; the shortened title ("Sports Nicknames") combined with the author's surname gets 196. It also doesn't fail WP:V, because it has an Amazon page with lots of info. --Masamage 03:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahh, hmm, that's what I get for quickly copy-pasting from the article. My mistake. Still seems to fail notability guidelines though. --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My father was given this book as a gift, and we have it in the library of the school where I teach. Someone may want to look him up if they come across the book, so I'd leave it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.24.207.141 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 22 October 2006  (UTC)
 * Delete 21 hits for the name? 196 with the book? Clearly non-notable. Opabinia regalis 04:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The book is not even close to meeting WP:BK. Also, this is a blatant copyvio of the Amazon review, actually so blatant that the copyright was copied along with the rest! Pascal.Tesson 04:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Also, everything but the first paragraph is a copyvio - copied directly from the amazon.com website. The Booklist review is clearly copyrighted (c) the American Library Association. -- Charlene 04:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I removed the copyvio text and added some references. What tipped the scale for me was the Booklist review's summary: "This is a specialized but comprehensive reference source for all libraries that can afford it." --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The only assertion of notability I see is "authority on sports nicknames" - cool thing to be, but not so much an encyclopaedic one. GassyGuy 13:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable; only book scores Amazon sales rank 1,750,000; not very notable either Arnoutf 14:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Terry Pruyne also contributed research for the Hyperion book, The Gospel According to ESPN: Saints, Saviors & Sinners, edited by Jay Lovinger. Check this link to Mansfield Universtiy where he taught English.
 * Keep His work is specialized but noteworthy. The article needs some expansion to feature its worth. Stormbay 00:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep: If you want a nickname expert, it's a good listing; if not, it's pretty random. But this site is made up of a ton of random listings. What makes this one any less worthy? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.204.204.234 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 23 October 2006  (UTC)
 * The argument, as stated several times above, is that WP:N makes it less worthy. 'Randomness' definitely isn't the issue. --Masamage 16:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is always good to have a guy who knows something about nicknames. And who knows, this column he writes may someday become syndicated and then everyone will want to know about it. This is definitely a keeper.And the book may not seem notable now, but I have a feeling it could become so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lrhowel (talk • contribs) 00:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)  — Possible single purpose account: Lrhowel (talk • contribs)  has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Delete nn author, below inclusion threshold. Eusebeus 13:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.