Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Reagan Allvord


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Terry Reagan Allvord

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. References only provide passing mentions. Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Significant coverage in cited sources, specifically:, . ~Kvng (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Neither of those sources come close to significant coverage, as they do not discuss the subject in detail. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * He's on 4 pages of the book. The whole intro in the All Hands piece is about the subject. It's definitely more than a "passing reference". ~Kvng (talk)


 * Delete actually as my searches found nothing better, still not convincing enough. SwisterTwister   talk  03:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Both the All Hands article and The History Press–published book provide significant coverage of the subject, allowing him to pass Notability. Cunard (talk) 06:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  18:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 00:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep it is a borderline case, and the page needs some cleanup, but a lot of less notable less accomplished persons have pages like Meg McGuffin. Legacypac (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. Hmm, I thought I had cleaned it up when I rewrote it. I did that because I felt that there was – just barely – enough coverage in the sources for a deletion proposal to fail. But if the consensus is that the coverage is insufficient I'll raise no objection. Whether or not other articles are worse has no relevance here; this page should be judged on its own merits (or lack thereof). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, admittedly a borderline case -- I found nothing for several searches until I did a Bing search without the middle name, under 'news' and found these sources.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.