Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Webster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 18:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Terry Webster

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Christian trumpeter. Authorship by user:Twwebster suggests a strong WP:COI. Is he notable? -- RHaworth 14:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable MECU ≈ talk 19:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep well know in the independent Christian music community. #1 artist on IndieHeaven. Helmsb 14:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Doesn't really seem notable, with few ghits and what appears to be a self-produced cd with no professional reviews. He is however 'most visited' artist on indieheaven, for whatever that's worth. StuartDouglas 12:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Not encyclopaedicSandy100YP 19:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC and being #1 amongst a collection of other NN artists doesn't really cut it.  Eliminator JR  Talk  21:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails Notability (music), and it appears to violates WP:COI as per nom. --Roswell native 21:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Seraphim Whipp 11:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Nom asked if he was notable, rather than making an argument that he wasn't. So saying "per nom" seems a bit...wide of the mark, somehow.  Xtifr tälk 11:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per EliminatorJR, who seems to be the first to have articulated the problem properly and succinctly. No reliable third-party sources at all. The apparent conflict of interest (and autobiographical tone) is the icing on the cake.  Xtifr tälk 11:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.