Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teru-Sama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Teru-Sama

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as nonnotable Pokécruft. Almost everything about this article is fan-made and/or speculation. SuperDT 06:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - "Teru-Sama appears to have no purpose in the game" - Wow, so totally worth an encyclopedia article. Feeeshboy 06:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Wow. Article creation, two speedies applied and removed (by two different editors), and an AfD in the span of 1 hour and 37 mins. Impressive. I can't make a judgement on the notability of this, but the comment needed to be made. Horologium talk - contrib 06:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's... an object in a video game which is never encountered in gameplay. Probably not even worth mentioning in the main article. Definitely not worth a separate article. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dormant, non-accessible game content has a high bar to overcome to become notable.  An item with no purpose except enabling OR certainly does not clear that barrier.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 09:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, unecyclopedic. Terence 12:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, highly non-notable item in the game. Both the item and the article have no purpose... and the fact that it got nominated for speedy twice and then nominated for AfD within two hours is only further proof of non-notability. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- Mailer Diablo 03:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.