Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesão de vaca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   soft delete. Because of low community involvement in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason J04n(talk page) 18:39, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Tesão de vaca

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It was supposed to be about an urban legend, but none of the sources say it is an urban legend (several of these sources don't suport what they were supposed to support). Actually the sources seem to indicate more that it works than that it does not work. The sources mention the term "tesão de vaca", but none of them say what it is. It is not even possible to say they are about the same thing. I believe it should be deleted as original research. Carlinho Teves (talk) 00:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaca  tion  9  00:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)




 * Comment - The Portuguese version has additional details. —  C M B J   13:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Per lack of independent reliable secondary sources and original research. The sources may trivially mention the term but don't define what it is (none of them say it is an urban legend). The article in Portuguese says almost the same things because it was probably translated from there (and the additional sources in Portuguese Wikipedia also do not define what it is; one of these sources even copies what is written on Desciclopedia, that is, Uncyclopedia in Portuguese). In conclusion, delete per lack of reliability. Algébrico (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.