Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestOut Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

TestOut Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Speedy declined as admin felt company may be notable. Google search returns no reliable sources, likewise no coverage of this corporation via Google News. Fails WP:ORG and more generally WP:GNG. Furthermore, article is mostly sourced to self-published sources (see criterion 5 of linked subsection) and comes across like spam or an advertisement for the company. Delete. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 12:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to find "significant coverage in secondary sources" about the company or its products. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete. This business develops IT certification training courses called LabSim.  Article is entirely advertising, containing a "mission statement" ("To make a difference in a person's life through education using breakthrough technology."), an entirely unreferenced but self-congratulatory company history (The company began incorporating videos, written lessons, and practice exam questions in each training series. Then UEC began integrating simulation technology into its computer-based training to give users hands-on experience.), and the rest and bulk of the article is a listing of the products it offers.  And, as noted, it's just not notable. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.