Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test Valley Lions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 01:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Test Valley Lions

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity page for amateur football (soccer) team playing in a "town" league at the 13th level of the English football league system, well below the level deemed notable ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; non-notable football team. GiantSnowman 13:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on notability grounds. However, I deprecate the characterisation as a "vanity page" in the nomination--cf WP:COI for reasons.-- S Marshall   Talk / Cont  15:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete notability. The logo in the article isn't even theirs, it's the Southhampton logo (pretty obvious as it even says that on it). Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable amateur football team, I can't find any sources except mentions of their games in local news and statistics from leagues. Hut 8.5 20:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Their charity work is certainly admirable, but unfortunately that's not enough for Wikipedia - after all, thousands of people do charity work. As a club, they fall below the generally acceptable guideline for English non-leaguers. Bettia   (bring on the trumpets!)  14:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nice article. Non-notable amateur team. -- Alexf(talk) 16:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Nice article however --Uksam88 (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.