Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test please delete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete. Mike Peel 20:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Test please delete

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An online discussion thread, notable only for being very long, with no cited sources at all. I don't think this is notable. DES (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my nom, unless reliable sources are cited to establish notability. DES (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It does however assert significance, so IMO it is not an A7 speedy. DES (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I do not agree that the claim that it is "believed to be the longest thread" is an assertion of notability, because it doesn't say who believes such a thing. Also, as noted, it is not supported by WP:RS. It is, therefore, believed that the subject is WP:NN. --Evb-wiki 17:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that an assertion of significance does not need to be supported by sources, reliable or otherwise, to take it out of the domain of WP:CSD. See WT:CSD for discussion of this. DES (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Evb-wiki. A worthless article.  --Malcolmxl5 17:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I doubt Guinness cares either. (and so tagged) Jauerback 18:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Even if it's true--so what? Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.