Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestingWhiz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

TestingWhiz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

First reference failed verification. Second reference is trivial coverage and isn't a WP:RS. Cannot find any better sources. My conclusion is that the subject does not currently meet WP:GNG or any other notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage by secondary sources.--Hu12 (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional article for a product that isn't notable. No significant coverage by secondary sources, and a search for news articles doesn't bring up anything. The subject does not meet the general notability guideline.-- xanchester  (t)  18:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I am unable to find coverage in reliable sources for this subject; does not appear to meet WP:GNG.  Gongshow  Talk 06:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search on High Beam which turned up no articles. Donner60 (talk) 06:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established by sources. - MrOllie (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Ref for ISTQB is available at http://testing-whiz.com/whiz-consulting.html. Also TestingWhiz is product of Cygnet Infotech[Affiliated with ISTQB]. In case failure again to authenticate, the content is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreativeItMind (talk • contribs) 14:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Just being a product isn't enough to establish notability. Independent, published sources are required.-- xanchester  (t)  14:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete sources are unreliable/insufficient to establish notability of this software. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 00:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The asoftware has not reached the required levels of notability to hold an article of its own. Maybe if it becomes widely recognized and popular, it may. — ΛΧΣ  21™  03:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.