Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teszt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow delete - this doesn't fit neatly into any CSD criteria, but has no hope of surviving AFD so I've called WP:SNOW SmartSE (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Teszt

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Zero indication of notability. I'm tempted to submit for speedy delete, but it's not a CLEAR hoax, so I figured this is the more appropriate route. Joel Why? talk  18:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I applaud the nominator's scrupulousness but I think this could easily be speedied as nonsense.  A term which the article's creator apparently cannot and will not define is of no use to anyone, including by potential transwikification.  Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Ubelowme (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ubeloweme's impeccable reasoning.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  19:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I couldn't take it anymore, so I went ahead and submitted it for speedy delete. It was making me just a tad bit dumber every time I looked at the page to see the edits made by these "editors". Let's see what admin does with it.    Joel Why?  talk  19:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.