Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While it seems clear this isn't a fictitious location, no evidence has been presented that this topic meets WP:GNG or WP:GEOLAND. Vanamonde (Talk) 12:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Tetake

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tetake is not a village or settlement in Nonouti. This article was created in 2008 appears to be fictitious. --Arorae (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Ths discussion page was not created with the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own on the article.  --Finngall talk  19:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Listed with a different spelling as "35 Tetaake private residence at risk from erosion S0 38 02.9 E174 25 00.2" (possibly not the same - coords are different) in http://www.climate.gov.ki/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Nonouti-Social-and-Economic-Report-2007-2-of-3.pdf page 32 (folio), page 2 (PDF). Listed on GeoNames as Tetake 00° 43' 00" S, 174° 28' 00" E (-0.716667, 174.466667), MGRS 60MTE1803320709 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * still some confusion between a real settlement (like a small village) and a private residence...--Arorae (talk) 22:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * te taake (also written te take) is a tropical bird with red feathers.--Arorae (talk) 22:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The place mentioned above could also be a sort of neighborhood or street name, but I see no basis to keep as a distinct and notable community. Reywas92Talk 15:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * there are no street names in Kiribati (never) even in the the only large town of South Tarawa. So it must be a residence.--Arorae (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Even if this is indeed a settlement, it would fall under populated places without legal recognition which need to meet GNG per WP:GEOLAND #2. Simply providing evidence that it exists or that people have lived there is insufficient. –dlthewave ☎ 17:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.