Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetragrammaton in the New Testament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Tetragrammaton in the New Testament
This page is just someone's personal issue with JW's translation of the Bible.George 19:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I guess &mdash; Multiple editors; multiple sources, so I'm skeptical with this being someone's personal issue. It appears of interest to religious scholars at least. &mdash; RJH (talk) 01:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral as it stands it is obnoxiously POV (not that I disagree mind you); maybe it could be merged/redirected to New World Translation? Eluchil404 12:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * After taking a closer look there is nothing worthwhile to merge. Just delete.  Eluchil404 01:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, I guess too, if it remains stable. It's a very interesting explanation as it stands.  However, it does seem to attract rather creative statements.Adminster 04:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Merge or move  are there any other bible's that use the tetragammaton in the new testament? Perhaps it would be more appropriately 'Tetragrammaton in translations of the New Testament'. A bit long winded, but certainly less misleading and more accurate. josh  buddy talk 05:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * On second thought, it seems like the content is dealing exclusively with the NWT. I would say merge whatever useful content is in there. josh  buddy talk 05:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * New World Translation appears to cover it well enough. josh  buddy talk 06:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Change to Merge whatever useful information is there. George 18:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Encyclopaedic topic, content disputes are not what AfD is about. Batmanand | Talk 15:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.