Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetralibro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Tetralibro
I just deleted the page Roberto Scano per Articles for deletion/Roberto Scano, and my guess is that this article should go much the same way. Deville (Talk) 04:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:NOT. there's only 105 distinct Ghits here, so it's easy to sift.  There's a lot of press releases, but no multiple non-trivial third-party articles about the concept; no awards, no evidence of genericization of the name, and so on.  As the article is solely about Tetralibra, there's no way to be encyclopedic, or not be an ad.  Since the only documentation are Tetralibra press releases, this raises the failure of [{WP:V]] as well.  Tychocat 15:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. Seems like self-promo. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.