Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetsunagi Kooni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ume Aoki. JForget 00:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Tetsunagi Kooni

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD by an Ip who left just "AfD it" as its edit summary, Contested REDIRECT by the same Ip who called it vandalism. I'm taking over this case. Not enough evidence of notability found. Fail both General Notability Guideline and the Specific Guideline for books. No licensor outside Japan found. No article in the Ja wiki and Anime News Network user editable encyclopedia. For a series serialized since 2006 to see no tankobon format release is a strong concern. Scanlation is erratic and trying to catch up. In summary below the reasons that lead me to ask for Delete:
 * Not enough evidence of notability found. Search returned illegal scanlitaions related websites & blogs
 * No licensor outside Japan
 * No ja wiki article, No ANN entry
 * No know tankobon format release
 * A erratic scanlation trying to catch up KrebMarkt 08:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Comment: Article creator & the Ip who contested both the PROD & REDIRECT were duly notified --KrebMarkt 09:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --KrebMarkt 09:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ume Aoki. I see no problem with this redirect - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Ume Aoki and trout, or even an extended block, for disruptive behavior. The IP editor has been informed several times to provide third-party sources instead of mass deprodding/mass restoring articles with no third-party source and insisting on AfD for obvious mergers/redirects, but has so far refused to cooperate or even discuss the matter. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:41, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ume Aoki. Edward321 (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.