Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetteh Plahar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Tetteh Plahar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. All of the references cited in the article do not exist.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8 (Talk) 18:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG and lacks citations. Darreg (talk) 21:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sorry, I see nothing convincing to show notability on Google. Lots of directory hits and similar sources, but no real leads to anything convincing. Unencyclopaedic article, full of unverifiable claims and peacock terms, written by someone who seems to have either a clear conflict of interest, or doesn't quite get how to write a WP article. I tried a few alternative Googles, but I'm afraid nothing remotely usable seemed to come up. Mabalu (talk) 10:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not gonna opine about notability, which is borderline one way or the other. This is a flat failure of verifiability — an essentially unsourced BLP. Carrite (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.