Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tewa Lascelles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 02:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Tewa Lascelles
Speedy Delete (CSD A7) -- I've AFD'd this as while i believe no claim to notability is established, other editors may disagree. This person is over 41st in line for the throne, has done nothing notable. Being in line isnt really notable, when everyboody in the UK is in line.  Matthew Fenton  (Talk | Contribs) 18:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete or mergeto George, 7th Earl of Harewood not notable in own right. Edited Ohconfucius 10:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for missing WP:BIO and for having no reliable sources. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per other articles nominated by same user -- Roleplayer 02:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Astrotrain 12:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Still not a vote, still no reason for keeping a subject who misses WP:BIO and escapes WP:CSD A7 iff 45st in line to the throne is notable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * OK then- how about being in the line of succession to the British throne is notable Astrotrain 21:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This is an argument difficult to reconcile with the absence of media references. Any number of biographical articles which have been deleted at AFD produced more news reports. If the subject is notable you'll be able to add more info and references. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into some article about his family provided that reliable references are added. Ardric47 20:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge per nom Mad Jack 06:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.