Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texags.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   18:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Texags.com
WP:NN, WP:SPAM, WP:WEB. BBtec 02:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the above -- Whpq 03:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:WEB. Reads like semicoherent WP:SPAM. -- Kinu t /c  04:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Valrith 11:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Mecanismo | Talk 16:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nuttah68 20:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Put down the beer bong and do some homework. --Xrblsnggt 02:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Khoikhoi 05:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete totally useless to the project - Burn It - Blood red sandman 14:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously, as incoherent nonsense, although it should be noted that (1) the claim about being the first to expose the Bomar thing is actually true - it was published on TexAgs.com 8 months ago and (2) TexAgs.com is very well known in the college football community and this deletion should be without prejudice. A well-written and sourced article on TexAgs.com would be very much appropriate. BigDT 19:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.