Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Exes - New York Chapter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Texas Exes - New York Chapter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:RUNOFTHEMILL, fails WP:BRANCH. Nothing worth discussing in the main page. I initially posted this as a PROD before noting that one was previously removed. BDD (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 15:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Texas Exes. Seems better for readers to have all the info in one place. Both articles are short.Kitfoxxe (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * That is: Assume the NY chapter is notable. Then readers of the main article can find out about the notable NY chapter and those interested in the NY chapter can have background on the organization itself.Kitfoxxe (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - a brief 1936 blurb and otherwise the parent organization's own publications do not support notability. I would just delete because someone searching for the chapter will find the information regarding the parent without a re-direct.--Rpclod (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as literally a local chapter for a group, no actual significance beyond it and then nothing for actual independence. SwisterTwister   talk  08:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.