Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas sea monster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fangtooth snake eel. Star  Mississippi  02:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Texas sea monster

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable, now identified sea creature (Fangtooth snake-eel), the coverage isn't lasting or all that significant. And 0 of the sources call it "texas sea monster" and what can be said about it is already covered in the name of the animal article. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Texas.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fangtooth snake-eel, not completely non-notable, given press coverage, but insufficient for a stand-alone article. Kleuske (talk) 18:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to Fangtooth snake eel which is almost as interesting a title as Texas sea monster. It is highly doubtful that this interesting sea animal will get extended coverage over a significant amount of time, and the appropriate place for this sighting is the Fangtooth snake eel article. Netherzone (talk) 20:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak redirect to Fangtooth snake eel as a relatively plausible search term (i.e., of the form [location] [subject]). -- Kinu t/c 23:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fangtooth snake eel, which is the sort of animal that this is. Content appears to already have been merged, so I don't see a need to merge it further. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Globster may be an appropriate redirect target here. Similar articles have already been redirected there but aren't currently mentioned on the page: Articles for deletion/Four Mile Globster, Articles for deletion/Philippine Globster. Plantdrew (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It has been identified as the Fangtooth snake-eel, so that seems more appropriate. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. This has already been merged in verbatim to Fangtooth snake-eel, but without a claim that it has subsequently been identified as A. chauliodus, let alone a cite for that. So for now, I oppose redirect. SpinningSpark 11:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.