Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textbook Excellence Award ("Texty")


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The basic issue of the award lacking independent coverage was not resolved. Sjakkalle (Check!)  21:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Textbook Excellence Award ("Texty")

 * – ( View AfD View log )

References look non-independent, and I wasn't able to find any good independent coverage. Appears unnotable. Sam at Megaputer (talk) 21:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Sam at Megaputer (talk) 21:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 01:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 01:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - having edited textbooks while a college instructor for almost two decades, and opened a library for a charter school last year, I've never heard of this award., what do you think? Bearian (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete If it is possible to make an article at all, it would be on the sponsoring organization, Textbook and Academic Authors Association, for this is only one of their several awards. The association operates by providing various tutoring and educational programs to authors, and awards for books. The purpose of the awards is promotional, and most of the information on the web is various publishers advertising their books. It's a genuine organization, not one that is   irresponsibly PR oriented, but I am not aware of it having any particular importance, nor its awards being considered significant .  An article could only be reasonably be written by someone without coi, for otherwise it would degenerate into PR--it is extremely difficult to cover such organizations in a NPOV with a conflict of interest, more so than almost any other subject.  DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 05:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely agree to Northern Escapee statement. If fails in passing WP:GNG. Setreis (talk) 08:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.