Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tha Inq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Tha Inq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:MUSBIO criteria Domdeparis (talk) 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Needs some expansion, but I don't see a reason why this has to be deleted. Parsley Man (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Adding nomination of Unqle Chriz, a duplicate article under a different name for the same artist. Additionally, article under that name was deleted in March of 2015 at Articles for deletion/Unqle Chriz. Safiel (talk) 08:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both Subject still does not satisfy the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO. Safiel (talk) 08:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both, no indication of how he meets WP:MUSICBIO, with no significant coverage online from WP:RS. Wikishovel (talk) 08:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm tempted to nominate Tha Inq for speedy delete db-a10, as WP:SPAs have been going back and forth between the two. Article creator has so far tried to blank the article, then remove what little sourced content there was, and has just now tried to alter the subject's birth name and birth date, for some reason. Wikishovel (talk) 13:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both. Fails WP:MUSICBIO, and doesn't come close to meeting WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely trivial and unconvincing and WP:NOT clearly applies. SwisterTwister   talk  18:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as having no reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 23:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete both The sources available do not seem to be reliable sources. Both articles are about the same individual, so it is OK to delete both. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.