Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thadeus House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 04:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Thadeus House

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources. The title of the article doesn't match anything in the text and it was created wholesale by what appears to be a single-purpose account. Gamaliel (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an extraordinary article. It seems entirely lacking in encyclopedic content and yet it has been around for five years and quite a lot of real people seem to have busied themselves updating it, correcting spelling mistakes, adding edit notices and all sorts. The bot interventions I can understand. If anyone can throw light on this strange behaviour I'd be delighted to change my !vote. Thincat (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I cannot find any sourcing for either the title in the article, nor the individual who seems to be the subject of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7. There is an unsourced claim for Nadar's notability, but this article, as far as I can figure it out, is about the house of one of his descendents. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per the above, no coverage in reliable sources. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It is really surprising, the article is there for last five years! Rayabhari (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - not exactly random nonsense, but close to it. Bearian (talk) 18:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.