Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tham Fook Cheong (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Speedily deleted per G4 by User:Floquenbeam. Non-admin close.''' – ukexpat (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Tham Fook Cheong
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

(This is the first time I've nominated an article for deletion - please bear with me and help out if I've done something wrong/missed something out.)

I think this article should be deleted because it doesn't meet the notability criteria. It was deleted for this reason in 2008 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tham_Fook_Cheong,_PPT) - this article is about the same person. CheesyBiscuit (talk) 09:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Having read through the guides this seems to be a candidate for a speedy deletion; I'm going to list it as such and let some more experienced editor decide. CheesyBiscuit (talk) 10:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G4, G11 and A7, as tagged. ukexpat (talk) 15:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note I've speedy deleted the article per G4; upon review of the old, previously deleted article, this is substantially the same, including multiple instances of identical phrases with non-standard grammar, indicating the original was simply copied and rearranged. If someone can do the AFD necessaries here, I'd appreciate it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.