Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanks

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was this article was Speedy Deleted at 16:04, 1 Jun 2005 UTC by MacGyverMagic. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:44, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Speedy this? I think not! Take a bow, gang! (Oh, and delete). Denni &#9775; 02:01, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
 * Enshrine somewhere before deletion. An interesting way to say thanks. A better way would be to return the favor and contribute stuff :-) A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  03:07, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * No vote, but endorse the sentiment. --Simon Cursitor 07:42, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep somewhere, somehow - someone be creative and think where!--Doc (?) 08:16, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Would BJAODN do? Proto 11:24, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * You're welcome but also delete Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 12:49, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * This content is speedy-able as an attempt to correspond. If someone were to write an actual article about the practice of thanking as part of etiquette and its role in various cultures, I might vote to keep. Meelar (talk) 13:45, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree it may be speedy deleted. If someone wishes to copy it to the latest BJAODN, go ahead. -- Infrogmation 14:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Copied to Village Pump since I love the idea of the message. Radiant_* 14:35, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Article author: "so just go on and delete this". It's copied and preserved. Now it can be speedied. Mgm|(talk) 16:03, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.