Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanksgiving (Malcolm in the Middle)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanksgiving (Malcolm in the Middle)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable and almost unintelligible Captain Infinity (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep It may not be a new Tv show but this is one of the memorable episodes. Its not like every malcolm episode has its own article some deserve there own episode. List of pokemon some of them have there own article and its a cartoon which is not reality but more notable than malcolm. Whats the harm. Plus it hasn't been linked to List of malcolm in the middle episodes yet to make it more known.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * "Memorability" does not equal Notability. This episode has noting notable about it. As for "What's the harm?" please see Other stuff exists.  Finally, it is indeed listed in the List of Malcolm in the Middle episodes, and has a perfectly serviceable plot synopsis there. --Captain Infinity (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete "Type what I see and call it an article" is not a suggested editing style, and this show had seven Thanksgiving episodes, all not special, and this is no different.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - messy, awkward, rambling attempt at describing the plot of a not particularly notable episode of a comedy show that already has season-by-season breakdowns and synopses. Eddie.willers (talk) 14:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of Malcolm in the Middle episodes per WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please be sure to read the article before suggesting a merge. It's rambling and incoherent.  There's nothing worth saving there. --Captain Infinity (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as mere plot WP:NOT, nothing to merge to the LoE. – sgeureka t•c 09:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet wp:N or wp:V, and I am not in favor of merging unsourced challenged material that seems like poorly written OR.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.