Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thannila Kandam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Ivanuku Thannila Gandam, an article about the same film under the most correct name. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 06:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Thannila Kandam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and no evidence of passing WP:NFILM. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 11:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment On my search I found these articles from Reliable sources mentioning the film under its title "Ivanuku Thannila Kandam" not what the article is currently is called so a name change maybe in order: [], [] (confirms it was in post production as of October 2014), and [). It's releasing tomorrow from what I searched so coverage is only going to increase in terms of reviews etc. [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: Ivanuku Thannila Kandam Ivanuku Thannila Kandam
 * WP:INDAFD: Ivanuku Thannila Kandam Ivanuku Thannila Kandam


 * Keep and move to proper name. We have a completed film with plenty of coverage. Sad that the  searches failed him, as WP:NFF was met when nominated, and WP:NF is met now.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I did another search. There is already an article for this film under its proper name: Ivanuku Thannila Gandam. This can be closed as redirect to it as well as ensuring the useful relevant info is moved over which I'm in the process of doing. Cowlibob (talk) 11:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay I've done up the main article so should be safe now to convert this to redirect as a plausible search term. Cowlibob (talk) 12:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No objection. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 12:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.