Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's So Raven: The Movie (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as simple, pretty much word-for-word, re-creation of previously deleted content (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's So Raven: The Movie). Please make use of db-repost for this sort of thing, rather than creating a whole new AFD nomination. Uncle G 17:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

That's So Raven: The Movie
This was nominated for deletion before, but someone has recreated the page. It all seems to be fancruft or speculation; as was said in the first discussion, there is no evidence to suggest a That's So Raven movie being produced in the near future. LBM 00:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If it was recreated, then it qualifies for WP:CSD. If it doesn't Delete Anyways for being not announced. Wikipeda isn't a crystal ball. -Royalguard11Talk 01:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That's So Deleted Danny Lilithborne 01:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and protect against future resurrection. Crabapplecove 02:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, that's so crystal balling. Speedy G4 if appropriate. -- Kinu t /c  02:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * G4 speedy delete: Recreation without change of the fundamentals that got it deleted in the first place.  Geogre 02:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment:Good use of the name, Kinu. - Tracker  TV  02:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete WP is so not a crystal ball. -- MrDolomite | Talk 03:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and protect from further recreation, that's so a recreation. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, as well. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 03:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That's So Stupid!, I know we're supposed to be polite but somebody has got to stand up for quality on Wikipedia. There must be 1 decent article for every 500 submitted. I think every article submitted to Wikipedia should be marked for deletion, and then we could undelete the ones worth keeping. george 05:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystalballism. It isn't even in pre-pre-production. --DarkAudit 13:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP not being a crystal ball AdamBiswanger1 14:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * G4 speedy Computerjoe 's talk  17:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.