Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thatcher's children


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Thatcher's children

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:DICDEF, no content other than a link to wiktionary, and even that is pretty short. South Nashua (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe WP:A3 applies in this case. I've tagged it. Speedy delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It does not apply, please read page histories and speedy deletion criterion before nominating for speedy deletion. - GB fan 20:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I did read page history. I simply misread the policy that it applies to "other than" soft redirects to sister projects. Which is no less wrong. But you're simply accusing me of the wrong kind of sloppiness. I'll remember for next time! Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry. It sure looked like you didn't read the page history as I specifically stated in my edit summary on the page history that WP:A3 did not apply to soft redirects to sister projects.  - GB fan 20:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay so it's both. I'm doubly sloppy! best and thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, should have initially mentioned I also put an A3 tag up when I nominated for deletion here. Great minds think alike! South Nashua (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.