Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thatcher–Blair consensus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Thatcher–Blair consensus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Personal essay on topic/concept of unproven notability. Uses a term scarcely found anywhere. Many sources, but none actually talk about the article subject, and are used merely for original synthesis. Possible POV fork of Blatcherism. See also discussion on talk page. Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with the above, seems like an undergrad essay. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Also agree. Blatcherism seems even more egregious actually. Mezigue (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, it is an essay. Blatcherism looks like a possible AfD too. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely an essay; a worthy subject for a PPE thesis, but original research does not a Wikipedia article make. This is Paul (talk) 23:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete It seems like OR. South Nashua (talk) 03:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.