Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The7stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep: nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure — Frankie (talk) 17:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

The7stars

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

1. Notability - are those 2 PR on PR inside story articles really good enough? (consider your soul before answering) 2. spam/advert/COI 3. userfy until good enough Widefox (talk) 02:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Withdrawn due to added refs. Widefox (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The7stars appears to be a highly notable media agency that has received tons of news coverage spanning years. I have added some info and references to the article to exhibit this. Silver  seren C 01:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 


 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG, per:, and . Good job User:Silver seren in finding sources and taking the time to add them to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Newly added links establish notability. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.