Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheCureForBoredom.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

TheCureForBoredom.com
Self explanitory very non-notable, the page even admits that the website is defunct and it's Alexa rating is in the 900,000+. Delete --Jaranda wat's sup 00:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete because as the article admits, it "ranks somewhere in the 900,000s on Alexa." Ruby 01:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very non-notable indeed. -Ikkyu2 01:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. VegaDark 03:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN. Ø  tVaughn05 talkcontribs 03:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable website. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 03:36, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Eurosong 04:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable website. J I P  | Talk 06:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Alexa rank around 900 000, no claim to significance. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly. We only have articles altogether for fuxxake, and only a small percentage of them pertain to websites. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  08:46, Jan. 26, 2006
 * Delete nn website. --Ter e nce Ong 09:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete an nn website --Nick123 (t/c) 21:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.