Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheEngine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

TheEngine

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems like it fails WP:GNG. Further information can be found at ru:TheEngine and ru:Skyfallen Entertainment. TheEngine on skyfallen.com « Ryūkotsusei »  04:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  « Ryūkotsusei »  04:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A1: No Context. Article has no information or sources at all that inform the reader what "TheEngine" is. Fails notability in general. No info found through original research that i conducted. Useless list page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD (talk • contribs) 15:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No. This is not a valid speedy deletion under A1 - There is enough information in the article to determine that TheEngine is a Russian made 3D Graphics engine. Anything that has sufficient context that you could find more information by googling is not "no context". No context is for an absolute lack of context whatsoever - for example, if the article merely said "TheEngine is an engine", that would likely be A1. Or if it said "TheEngine is Russian", or "He is a funny man, He drives a red car.", etc etc.  casualdejekyll  22:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree that this isnt A1, But I cannot find any information on "TheEngine" on google. I apologize for my false judgement. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 18:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless someone can come up with sources that demonstrate notability. None are here now or appear to exist. And no, it does not qualify for speedy deletion because it does indeed have context. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability. Gabe114 (talk) 12:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This automatically fails WP:GNG. No sources (let alone any reliable ones), no external links, no thing to indicate any sort of nobility. All it is is just a dictionary-esque statement with a list of games that supposedly use this engine, even though nothing is cited to that fact. Heck, this article even neglects the individual or company that made the engine. Captain  Galaxy  12:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see any indication of notability to pass WP:GNG, and nothing to meet WP:NSOFT either. Jacona (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.