Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheHeartIsDeceitfulAboveAllThings

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Whoa. Highly POV, totally non-encyclopedic. There looks to be something salvageable in it, though. Is there anyplace to merge the useful content? - Lucky 6.9 18:23, 20 May 2004 (UTC)

How will the community who post here react? By deleting this garage. RickK 19:22, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Man, I've heard of deleting articles, but never garages before. Do we delete the cars too? :) Snowspinner 19:27, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
 * You know, that was almost precisely what I was going to post, except I wouldn't put my car in it. If someone can be bothered salvaging what there is to salvage, that's nice. But delete. - David Gerard 20:06, May 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * LOL! I guess I won't correct my posting, then.  :)  RickK 23:11, 20 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. The verse is one of my favourite Bible verses.  But this is an ad, evangelism, and general malarkey.  Smerdis of Tlön 19:26, 20 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Snowspinner 19:27, 20 May 2004
 * Delete, not encyclopedic. (Rick says it's garage, but I think it's verse). Wikipedia articles are not textbooks and should not contain problem sets or exercises for the reader. 4.242.63.81 should be encouraged to make appropriate contributions with encyclopedic style and content. Dpbsmith 20:19, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly misplaced evangelism, no evidence that it's encyclopedic. It will be interesting to see how the poster reacts to this; Discuss this on the talk page not here unless it's relevant to the decision as to whether the article is kept. Andrewa 20:53, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Not encyclopedic. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998 02:41, May 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, this isn't encyclopedic by a long shot. --Starx 05:06, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, even though it's a pure heated garage, it must go. Not encyclopedionical by any stretch. Verily. Denni 03:37, 2004 May 23 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.