Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheScoop08


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

TheScoop08

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not entirely sure if this is notable outside of the usual and expected news coverage at that time and my searches found nothing better than this and this and, as this was a one-time event and unlikely to start again (nothing to suggest this even continued after 2008), there's also no move target and there has been no better improvement since starting in September 2007. Pinging past editors and. SwisterTwister  talk  05:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I would agree on that, as its only really covering it in 2008. It doesn't even tell you where it is. Is it really needed, I think not. Rugby Sevens are coming 23:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Does not satisfy WP:GNG.--Newbreeder (talk) 17:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.