Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 100 Greatest TV Characters

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 16:45, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The 100 Greatest TV Characters
Totally incomplete, misleading title inviting POV disputes. Just one edit in Dec 2004. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * After all these months, no-one is likely to complete this. Bin it - CLW 19:49, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this and the missing ninety percent of the article, same reasons as "Top 10 Symphonies" a couple of days ago. At least this one identifies a source, although it's not an authoritative one, just a Bravo TV series whose selection criterion isn't stated but seems to be "a producer thought these were his favorites".  Not encyclopedic, not complete nor being completed, WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information.  Barno 20:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV. &hearts;purplefeltangel (talk) &hearts; (Contributions) 21:44, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone volunteers very, very quickly to rescue this hopelessly POV and incomplete article. Batmanand 22:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV and always will be. DannyZz 00:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep but only if the article is written about the TV special on this subject. The article appears to be scrambled at the moment so I have no idea if it's saveable, but it is not POV to chronicle a TV special - provided it is clearly identified as being a TV special and not a user's personal list. 23skidoo 04:13, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, whether it's linked to a TV series or not: if so, because Wikipedia is not a promtonal vehicle; if not, because it's inherently POV. --Calton | Talk 04:27, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV has no place in an encyclepedia
 * Delete. Although I don't see this as POV (it's about a TV programme), and although I don't see it as using Wikipedia as a promotional vehicle (too badly written for that), I think it should be deleted as it's just not notable. I suspect that original creator of the article happened to be watching the programme at the same time - these sorts of programme always count up from 100 or 50 or whatever - and then he/she just got bored. --A bit iffy 11:51, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.