Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 100th human


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The 100th human

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

NN book by a small NN publisher. Fails WP:BK, no 3rd party sources, Wikipedia is not a book review site. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 20:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, doesn't show notability.  TheAE  talk / sign  20:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article fails to state why the book is notable and since I can't find any significant references or reviews, I can't tell it myself either. - Mgm|(talk) 10:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.