Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 100th human (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  06:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

The 100th human
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

See previous debate at Articles for deletion/The 100th human. Article has expanded significantly beyond reach of G4, but still doesn't explain why the book is notable Mgm|(talk) 13:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The article says the book is self-published and given away. This might be a good thing to do but not notable. Northwestgnome (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sign of reviews in reliable sources. Non-notable self-published novel. JulesH (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.