Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 10 greatest voices in music history


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Roy boy cr ash  fan   00:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

The 10 greatest voices in music history

 * Original research and personal opinion. The list given is hardly verifiable. so  U  m  y  a  S  ch  10:48, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 'This dude is smart.-Raju — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.199.146 (talk • contribs)
 * Personal opinion, unverifiable, etc, etc. Delete. Palfrey 10:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 11:14, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - just plain wrong, might even be WP:BALLS. Ac@osr 11:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an encyclopaedic article. Zaxem 11:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails Verifiability, WP:NOR and possibly WP:NPOV too. -- Grafikm_fr   (AutoGRAF)  11:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, in all of music history, 9 of the best 10 singers are alive right now. Delete. ProhibitOnions 12:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unencyclopedic, plus the author of the article can't count Metros232 12:14, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, or spell. Who is Roger Dalfrey?  Kotepho 12:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. Bucketsofg✐ 12:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, patent nonsense. "Ummm... dunno who else". Jdcooper 13:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, nonsense. &mdash;M e ts501 talk 15:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete title is inherently POV. --Bachrach44 15:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Inherently POV and, as it stands, garbage. No Sinatra, no Billie Holiday, no Nat King Cole, but it includes Eminem? Fan1967 16:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It is all opinion Fiwtart 14:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Per NOT. --Lee Bailey 19:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Grafkim, and, well, everyone else. Likely could be speedied as patent nonsense, but some define that term very narrowly.  Joe 19:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and inherently POV title. TheProject 21:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - to me, this qualifies as nocontext. Grand  master  ka  00:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.