Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 1976 ABC Edit of 'On Her Majesty's Secret Service'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to On Her Majesty's Secret Service (film). Content may be merged at editorial discretion, but if done, the redirect must be preserved for attribution. Regards,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 21:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

The 1976 ABC Edit of &
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems similar to recent AfD for Die Hard films on television. The television edit could instead be described within the main article about the film. This article could serve as an example to lead to other television edits when they can instead best be summarized in the related film article if the television edits are notable. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with On_Her_Majesty%27s_Secret_Service_(film), and perhaps Re-edited_film. It already has about 3 sentences on the main film page, perhaps that could be expanded, but it doesn't seem like the most novel thing that films are edited for content on tv.  I suppose it's mildy interesting trivia to point out the uniqueness of this film edit, but a standalone article doesn't seem like the way to do it.Cander0000 (talk) 06:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into On Her Majesty's Secret Service (film) - Whilst it's an interesting edit, it's not notable enough to be spun out into a separate article. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  10:47, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not remotely notable as an independent subject. Specific edits might be relevant to the film article but since this article cites no independent reliable sources there's nothing here to merge and nothing that justifies this implausible redirect. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 00:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Whatever pieces can be salvaged with RS should just be in the main article for the film. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and include anything salvageable (ie. sourceable) to the main article. No need for a spin-off. Rlendog (talk) 16:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge The above two "delete but include it in the main article" are not GFDL-compliant outcomes. If we're going to keep any part of it, we need attribution. Jclemens (talk) 23:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mike Cline (talk) 17:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, per nom. Nuujinn (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge content into main film article with attribution. Notable point about artists'/film-companies' control of their own film-product.Shearonink (talk) 13:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.