Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 20/20 Experience – The Complete Experience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

The 20/20 Experience – The Complete Experience

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All of the content here is essentially a repeat of information from The 20/20 Experience – 2 of 2. Justin Timberlake discography already does the job of documenting this album's existence. –Chase (talk / contribs) 16:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Given that it earned a Grammy nomination. Erick (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  17:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Should all compilation albums be deleted then? It charted on several national charts and as Erick said, was nominated for a Grammy. — Status  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 18:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * No, not all compilation album articles should be deleted. Many, such as The Immaculate Collection, offer quite a bit of encyclopedic value. This article is no more than a copy/paste from the 2 of 2 article; and we have List of awards and nominations received by Justin Timberlake and Justin Timberlake discography to discuss award nominations and chart positions. "Merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. This is getting ridiculous. Keep per Status and Erick. — Tomíca (T2ME) 18:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:Speedy keep. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Any album that is nominated for a Grammy Award is obviously notable. -- Biblio worm  20:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep SNOW KEEP at this point. Nominated for a Grammy = Notable per WP:NALBUMS. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong keep, as the album was Grammy-nominated and has charted on its own. As for the content of the article, we should strive to improve it – deleting the article is not the way to go here. —  Ma y ast  ( talk ) 12:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * To all above citing WP:NALBUM and the Grammy nomination as the sole reason to keep, please note that NALBUM also states, "All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." –Chase (talk / contribs) 15:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.