Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ABC Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steppenwolf discography. (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

The ABC Collection

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no significant coverage per WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 02:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   07:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   07:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Steppenwolf discography. I can't find significant coverage for this release to warrant a standalone article, but redirects are cheap and it's a plausible search term.  Gongshow   talk  21:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect - I'm not sure it will be a very common search term but it is not a difficult task to accomplish since it does not warrant an independent article.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Gongshow. Compilation albums are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — they can still sometimes clear WP:NALBUMS on the same criteria as a studio album (e.g. a greatest hits album released while the band is still active, and thus typically contains one or two new or previously unreleased songs as extra sales bait), but they're not given an automatic freebie just because the band has an article. It's a plausible enough search term that it should indeed be kept in place as a redirect to the discography, but the depth of reliable source coverage needed to make it notable just isn't there. Bearcat (talk) 13:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to Steppenwolf discography as a plausible search term. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.