Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Abakanowicz Art Room


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

The Abakanowicz Art Room

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline. " It was deprodded by User:Kontrola (creator). The topic of this is unclear, but the subject seems to be either an artwork, or a digital application/publication about one, or both. In either case, the coverage of the work (few online mentions) does not seem to make it pass WP:GNG. Whatever this is, it is not notable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I would say that it is the first publication in art and art room of polish painter. Magdalena Abakanowicz is one of the most influential polish artist of all times. It is a shame  to delete the pieces which show the level of art from Poland. Kontrola (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no independent, reliable sources. Magdalena Abakanowicz is undoubtedly notable, but a mobile app, created for an exhibition of her work, is not; unless it receives extensive coverage. That the app is the first app to be created with "Straight eye technology" might be interesting if it was explained what that was. I find no mentions of it anywhere, and expect that if it was new an notable, I would be able to find a mention somewhere. Mduvekot (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Lot of information was published about this theme on local newspapers, TV News (TVP Poland), and Facebook (exhibition in New York City). Kontrola (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Then add references to those sources. You need to demonstrate notability, not merely assert it. You can skip Facebook, not a reliable source. Mduvekot (talk) 00:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If it really was important, the odds are good it would be at least mentioned in her Polish article, not to mention have its own article on pl wiki. Yet I don't see this work even mentioned in pl:Magdalena Abakanowicz... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom, and discussion above. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  10:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete simply not a notable thing. The painter, yes. A newly created VR app without adequate coverage in reliable source? No.104.163.140.228 (talk) 03:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.