Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Access Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

The Access Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability unclear, looks very promotional, all but two sources are the company webpage (and the two sources are just a report of an acquisition and membership in a group) creffett (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment/Delete I agree, as much as I hate to see someone's work be destroyed, there is no basis for the amount of information provided in this article. A list of services from a company like this is egregious and I don't see a real reason to keep this article. Should there be sources this might be a WP:TNT. ScienceAdvisor (talk) 09:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article featuring a brochure-like summary of the company's wares and its acquisition history. The product history shows features being added at the expected times - nothing in the article or found elsewhere indicates these to have been significant innovations. Press releases are insufficient for WP:NCORP; I added a brief bylined City AM item but that too falls under the Examples of trivial coverage. Overall, a midsize company going about its business but without independent indication of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.