Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventurer (1948 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technically ineligible for soft deletion, but this has been open for three weeks and it does not appear any input is forthcoming and there is no argument present to keep the article. Star  Mississippi  02:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

The Adventurer (1948 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Film appears to fail WP:NFILM, as only 1 book source cited and no others found in a BEFORE. Donald D23  talk to me  21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: as it's ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  19:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete- Does not meet WP:NFILM criteria, and this is also obscure enough that if it's mentioned in another article (List of Obscure Egyptian Films, anyone?), it would be enough just to expand that a little and remove the full page. Also, are we sure that IMDB is a Wikipedia-worthy source? Vdbhi (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.