Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Captain Jack (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The Adventures of Captain Jack
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:N, WP:V, and WP:OR. I can't find substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources (or any reliable sources, for that matter). One source is a chronology that 404s, which according to the previous AFD was just a passing mention. The other source is a catalogue. I really just don't see any way for this to meet our guidelines for inclusion. The Wordsmith Communicate 16:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I believe that this is the chronology mentioned above - it is indeed just a brief mention. The previous discussion ended as no consensus, I believe if held today with the same discourse it would be closed as delete. No real evidence of coverage is given - one editor cites an Amazon.com user review. The closing admin stated that if sources weren't found and added "over the course of a few months, then the matter can be revisited" - that was more than three years ago - such improvement has not occurred. I can find no evidence of significant coverage by third party reliable sources (published since or before the last discussion) which would indicate that the topic meets the criteria for inclusion set out in the general notability guideline or the specific guideline for web content. Additionally to me the dearth of coverage suggests that a merge to Mike Kazaleh - where the topic is already briefly mentioned - would not be appropriate. Guest9999 (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.