Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Marco & Gina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst ✈(conjugate) 04:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

The Adventures of Marco & Gina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Article has not been sourced since its creation. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I had to do a HighBeam search in order to find anything useful, but it turned up this article originally from VideoAge International. From there, I decided to do a Google search, pairing the name of the series with "Rai Trade", and I came up with these   - the first is from a publication called The Business of Film, which I'm not personally familiar with, but it clearly seems to be an RS. The second is from Variety. I also found this, which appears to be from a blog of some sort, although Google translate leads me to believe that the owner of the blog actually worked on the series - so it may be an admissible primary source, per WP:USERGENERATED. I have to head out somewhere, so I haven't gone through all of the search results. These are just the first three that jumped out at me. If someone wants to spend even just a few more minutes on this, they'd probably find even more refs. But I feel like the linked to articles are enough on their own to display notability. --Jpcase (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as reliable sources have been found I think WP:GNG has been passed.Atlantic306 (talk) 04:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as this seems enough and I would've even closed as such. (NAC). SwisterTwister   talk  20:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.