Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Aesthetics of Lostness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

The Aesthetics of Lostness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a website to host quotes, it is an encylopedia. This article should be deleted, and moved to Wikiquote if it is not there already. Ethanlu121 (talk) 22:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of its notability. No refs, no categories. Nothing. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Per a book source I found (it won't let me link it here for some reason without it messing up the page) it looks like this was also the title of an article he wrote, likely non-fiction. This could probably be added to the list of his non-fiction works at Ray_Bradbury_bibliography and just redirected there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing relevant to an encyclopedia present in the article. No sources, assertion of any notability or context, for that matter. Ciridae (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to recreation. I think I can see where this is coming from. Westfield_Horton_Plaza links to The Aesthetics of Lostness because the essay played a role in Jon Jerde's development. It's probably better to add a source for that claim to the Westfield_Horton_Plaza article, like this one, than to link to an article that isn't written yet. I'll go add the source and remove the link now. Mduvekot (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.