Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Alliance for Surgery and Anesthesia Presence (ASAP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein. North America1000 15:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

The Alliance for Surgery and Anesthesia Presence (ASAP)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline notability Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Article is sourced well. Strongest argument for deletion is "borderline", which doesn't hold up. People making delete requests on grounds of notability should be sure it should be deleted, the onus is on them to provide evidence, not to simply put an article up for deletion on a whim.Egaoblai (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 17:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment (before I decide) -- As far as I am concerned, notability is determined by the difference the group has made, not where they meet, or who is on the membership roster. Notability is not inherited. That's why WP generally shuns mission statements. Don't tell me what you intend to do; show me what you've done. The papers and research ought to be first, if it is to stay Rhadow (talk) 10:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.