Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Alliance of the Cradle of Mystery

The Alliance of the Cradle of Mystery
I can find no mention of this secret society anywhere. I know, it's secret. But who are we to reveal such a well-kept secret? I'm not even sure this page rises above patent nonsense. It's certainly not verifiable. -Rholton 16:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possible joke by anon, possible element of some ficton, most probably both. Who cares? Secrets should be kept. Andrewa 17:23, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe there's a place for this somewhere on the web, but it's not here. Carrp 18:22, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The Alliance does exist, granted we aren't big, powerful or old but we are here. We are mentioned on the secret society page under the student societies, upon reflection maybe we really aren't big enough to be there, and so I'll remove that reference and not put any other references anywhere else on wikipedia. In return I ask you to consider letting us keep this page of our own, we'll be no trouble, honest!
 * This post by the article's author. We don't any of us own individual articles, there are other Wikis you might try if that's what you want. See your talk page for more comments. No change of vote. Andrewa 23:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone greatly expands the article so it doesn't come off sounding like vanity or fancruft for an unspecified RPG or sci-fi franchise.
 * (Sigh) you're supposed to be on my side. Please sign your posts, 23skidoo. Andrewa 23:20, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't know what vanity or funcruff are, but I've expanded the article and hope it doesn't sound like either.
 * Info about vanity pages: Vanity page. As for what Cruff and Fancruff are I've been wondering myself, but have only just bothered to look for a defintion. Unfortunately there are no matches on wikipedia, wiktionary or google (other than Cruff as a surname). Thryduulf 22:50, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) (this is not a vote).
 * You spelled it wrong, that's why you diidn't find anything. :) Fancruft - Jeltz talk  23:05, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * ps: please could you sign your name after your comments. to do this type for just your name, or ~ for your name and the current date and time. Thryduulf 22:53, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * This post of course also by the article author. No change of vote. Andrewa 23:15, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense.  RickK 23:02, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this to help them protect their secret. They wouldn't want to see their secret society on google, right? Then it wouldn't be very secret. - Jeltz talk  23:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, otherwise the Alliance will hunt down the original author. --Deathphoenix 02:31, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm the original author, and I now agree with you, maybe wikipedia is not the place for this. We will find a new home
 * Delete. Unverifiable. jni 17:24, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. Gamaliel 18:14, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research&mdash;unless verifiable sources are presented confirming the existence of the society and the accuracy of the information in the article prior to expiration of VfD. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:41, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)